Highly Technical Discussion of Rudder Servo Configurations

[SlowHuck]

I thought it best to move this discussion to it's own thread so as not clutter up the one where it was started and otherwise distract from the excellent work of David Kocjančič...

http://giantscalenews.com/threads/d...-worlds-greatest-scratch-builder-period.1381/
​

A highly technical dissertation of the technical considerations of this unique rudder control servo installation was initiated by Pistolero's comment regarding this complex, yet beautifully functional configuration David engineered for his scratch-built 50% Extra 330.

Warning! This discussion contains dissertations on sophisticated engineering and physics concepts that may overload less than adequately prepared minds. Education at the level of Masters or Phd is recommended for participation in this discussion. At the very least have a dictionary at the ready.
​

No kidding! While I really gotta hand it to David for the engineering of this (as well as the entire aircraft), why not just go with the 3 servos aligned in a row?

Because the opposing torsional duplicity results in a superior harmonic gestalt enabling sympathetic dimensional polarity between the low-level frequencies being distributed among the acute geometric tolerances demanded of this particular application of quantum theory.

Hmmmmm.... but Slowhuck....do you think the celestial harmonic resonance combined with the embryonic elasticity would have a “noise canceling” (for a better word) effect on the rotor wash vortex generated by the trans harmonic coupling effect?

Excellent observation! It does depend on the atmospheric dissonance created by the multiple morphemic properties that result from systolic and rhythmic oscillations created by said celestial harmonic resonance. On the other hand, when certain variabilities exist within an established range of embryonic elasticity, no rotor wash vortex could be accurately measured using current technology, so harmonic coupling is merely theoretical. BTW, the term “noise canceling” has lately fallen out of favor as a descriptor of this effect - it is more accurately referred to as "sonum elidentibus."

Please feel free to add your thoughts...

 

[reyn3545]

Shee-yut, that thang looks fancy to me!

 

[yakken]

I think it makes the flapper on the back flap[emoji12]

 

[49dimes]

Soap and water.

 

[Pistolera]

Brilliant, but funny....and obfuscating, confusing and utterly confounding!!!!! My head hurts....

 

[jaybird]

The technology is borrowed from this

 

[Islandflyer]

Beautiful!
Talk about a fabrication challenge so that mechanical travels are precisely matched at all points, in all directions!
This guy in like a jeweler!

 

[SlowHuck]

Transonic impulses to the trans vaginal mesh would be stretched beyond the drag coefficient guys. Simple.

Not so simple. Depending on the material composition of the trans vaginal mesh, the transonic impulses could actually compromise the structural integrity to the point that a vacuum is created, completely overcoming the drag coefficient and making the reversal of insertional procedures difficult, if not impossible. Read Wilber B. Pandering's Studies in Copulatory Theory, Chapter XIX, paragraph 69.

 

[SlowHuck]

The technology is borrowed from this

This was a huge mistake on the part of Rockwell. Their product development team completely underestimated the pace of change in the market demographic and it's reluctance to adapt to a totally new methodology in the operational nuances suggested by their version of the retro encabulator - as a result loosing roughly $7.3 million in the process. A small Swiss firm, Dumme Amis LTD, owned the market and was only able to recently achieve limited success with it's reconfigured retro encabulator.

 

[49dimes]

Soap and water.