• If you are new to GiantScaleNews.com, please register, introduce yourself, and make yourself at home.

    We're 1st in Giant Scale RC because we've got the best membership on the internet! Take a look around and don't forget to register to get all of the benefits of GSN membership!

    Welcome!

Are you going to register with the FAA? Cast Your Vote!

Are you going to register with the FAA?

  • Yes

    Votes: 59 67.0%
  • No

    Votes: 29 33.0%

  • Total voters
    88

Judge

70cc twin V2
You already agreed to stay under 400 feet when you got your AMA and chose to fly an an AMA affiliated field.


Sorry, that is 100% incorrect. I have no idea where you got that idea, but it absolutely not true. The one and only mention of altitude in the AMA Safety Code is the requirement to notify and airport if you intend to fly above 400 feet within 3 miles of an airport.

And if it was true explain to me how the AMA allows soaring, IMAC, and pattern to be held at the National flying site in Muncie??
 

Judge

70cc twin V2
That may be true, I can't argue it... but I know our club instituted, we were told at the request of AMA, to institute a 400 ft ceiling or risk loss of AMA affiliation.

Your club may have that limit, many clubs do for various reasons, but anyone who told you you were risking your AMA affiliation was full of shait.

Also, the FAA has long held an expectation that modelers would operate at a 400 ft ceiling, with a 100 ft buffer between them and the floor flying height for full scale aviation...

http://www.faa.gov/documentlibrary/media/advisory_circular/91-57.pdf

And for the umpteenth time, AC are purely voluntary, and AC 91-57 even stated that at the very beginning. FAA would like to see most people stay below 400 feet, but it is not now, nor has it ever been a requirement of the FAA or AMA. Neither Section 336 or Part 101.41, which codifies Section 336, have nay mention of 400 feet as an operating limit. In addition, the current AC 91-57A, which replaces the older version and is again purely Advisory in nature, only mentions 400 feet as a best practice and it not at all a regulatory requirement.
 
Just my opinion. The FAA should only be concerned with rc aircraft equipped with FPV and GPS. But no, the FAA wants to include all rc aircraft so they can collect huge sums of money. Just my opinion. It's not just about the money with me. I am sick and tired of our governments from the local level all the way up to the feds always looking for ways to have control over every aspect of our lives.
 

Krzy4RC

GSN Contributor
Your club may have that limit, many clubs do for various reasons, but anyone who told you you were risking your AMA affiliation was full of shait.



And for the umpteenth time, AC are purely voluntary, and AC 91-57 even stated that at the very beginning. FAA would like to see most people stay below 400 feet, but it is not now, nor has it ever been a requirement of the FAA or AMA. Neither Section 336 or Part 101.41, which codifies Section 336, have nay mention of 400 feet as an operating limit. In addition, the current AC 91-57A, which replaces the older version and is again purely Advisory in nature, only mentions 400 feet as a best practice and it not at all a regulatory requirement.

Except, that now if/when you register you are required to state that you will not fly over 400 ft. I will wait to register, I know that in ALL of the IMAC contests I have attended we do not follow that limit. I am hoping that the AMA will allow for use of our AMA # and by pass having to agree to this.
 

reyn3545

100cc
Its a little (well, a lot) misleading that they are launching this is a UAV registration initiative... there's not a single question in the registration process about what you fly or how you fly, just your name, address, phone number and credit card number (they'll refund the $5 after registration). You acknowledge that you'll abide by the guidelines that we've all seen, your email address is validated, and you are complete.

They should call it a pilot registration program. Oh, there's a 50-page document that you can find if you look around just to tell you how to display your registration number, complete with case study type of examples from other industries (like prosthetic devices) that demonstrate the value of registration.

Look, I'm not a big fan of it, but I don't see it as a credible challenge to the way I fly, the places I fly, or the responsibility that I would take if my plane lost radio contact and hit someone else's property. Will I place the registration number in all of my planes? Do I display my AMA # in all of my planes? Maybe I'm not the most responsible person on the planet in that regard. I don't see this registration process as a great political platform, just a nuisance that the government is going to push down our throats regardless of what the AMA tries to do. It's a rubber stamp, just like gun registration, that doesn't make the world one bit safer.
 

reyn3545

100cc
I suspect that in 6 months or so, we'll see a process that allows you to go to the AMA website and register for BOTH AMA and FAA. They'l probably get a few cents out of the transaction, and they'll inform the members that they'll continue to work tirelessly to address the concerns of their members.

The AMA has about .08% of the spending power of the FAA, and their revenue comes from membership applications, not from government appropriations. When Uncle Obama says to register all the drones, if for no other reason so that he can say in his next speech that the skies are safer... then the FAA will do exactly what they have done. How the ever dream to enforce these new guidelines is anybody's guess.
 

Flyin4fun

70cc twin V2
Except, that now if/when you register you are required to state that you will not fly over 400 ft. I will wait to register, I know that in ALL of the IMAC contests I have attended we do not follow that limit. I am hoping that the AMA will allow for use of our AMA # and by pass having to agree to this.
Not true.... you are required to "acknowledge" the "guideline" not to fly over 400 feet..... huge difference.
 
Top